Hospital and service-area views
Compare recorded activity across sites, periods and referral cohorts, then examine the cases behind a difference.
Oriva
Donation records.
A clearer review.
Oriva brings hospital and referral exports into a connected review workspace. Reconcile records, investigate cases that need attention and examine the timing and outcomes behind donation activity.
For donation quality teams, hospital development staff and operations leaders.
The review starts
between the records.
A hospital death record and a donation referral log describe different parts of the same process. Matching them is the beginning. Reviewers still need to understand timing, eligibility, missing information and what happened next.
Oriva brings those questions into one workspace, with case-level evidence behind the aggregate view.
From source records
to a focused review.
A retrospective quality and operations workflow.
Reviewers assess the findings and decide the next action.
- 1
Reconcile the records
Connect hospital death and donation referral exports. Inspect matches, missing information and records that need further review.
- 2
Review the case behind the count
Explore possible missed or late notifications through case-linked queues. Keep unknown eligibility visible and inspect the supporting evidence.
- 3
Understand the process
Examine donation stages, timing intervals and organ outcomes. Move from aggregate patterns to the contributing records.
- 4
Carry the review forward
Track case follow-ups and export CSV or PDF reports with source context and stated limitations.
A pattern is useful
when you can inspect it.
Stay connected to the records that explain a finding.
Timing and organ outcomes
Explore intervals across the donation pathway and examine recorded organ dispositions, with source limitations kept visible.
Defined data, accountable review
Keep customer sources separate, control access by role and retain an audit trail. Configure review rules to the agreed scope.
An evaluation with your team
Start with your
review process.
Choose a defined hospital group, agreed review rules and authorized retrospective exports. Evaluate Oriva against the work your team needs to complete.
Agree the scope
Map the current review, required records, reporting definitions and the questions the evaluation should answer.
Check the findings
Compare review candidates with independent case review. Account for incomplete records and unknown eligibility.
Measure the work
Compare the effort to prepare, investigate and report. Use the results to decide the next step.
Informed by published research.
Oriva’s development draws on ORCHID 2.1.1, the organ donation research dataset hosted on PhysioNet. Research evaluation informs the implementation; evaluation with a donation program uses that program’s authorized data and agreed definitions.
Oriva is developed by Forelith. The workflow illustration shows the review concept and contains no patient data.
Make the next review
a clearer one.
Explore a focused evaluation of your donation quality workflow.